Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Pike's Peak Fuel Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 18, 1927No. 11,784PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

The plaintiff in error (plaintiff below) applies for a supersedeas. The writ of error is to review the judgment of the district court dismissing the plaintiff’s petition for a writ of prohibition directed to the public utilities commission.

On August 20, 1923, the relator filed with the public utilities commission a complaint against The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company, alleging that rates on coal from Pike View to Pueblo were unjust and un-. reasonable. After a hearing, the commission, on December 18, 1924, made its order reducing the rates on certain grades of coal. On December 23,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shreve v. Copper Bell Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. McAneny v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1906
  3. People ex rel. Lindsley v. District Court of Fremont CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  4. In re the Estate of DelaneyNevada Supreme Court · 1918
  5. First Nat'l Bank of Covina v. Ruddock Co.California Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  2. Eveready Freight Service, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  3. Wiltgen v. BergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. Justice Court v. People Ex Rel. HarveySupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  5. City of Thornton v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API