Legal Opinion

Hause v. Hause

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 22, 1882PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Bamsey county, Brill, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

Plaintiff and defendant Lodowic own certain lands as tenants in common. Lodowic having been in possession and cultivation of the same during the years 1878 and 1879, plaintiff brings this action to recover his just proportion of the rents and profits, under Gen. St. 1878, c. 75, § 43. The complaint appears to have been framed with reference also to a recovery for rent, upon the basis that, by agreement, the relation of landlord .and tenant had been created between plaintiff and defendant Lodowic as respects plaintiff’s undivided third during the years 1878 and 1879. Upon the trial, and upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kean v. ConnellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Humphries v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Williams v. Sinclair Refining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Ayotte v. NadeauMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Canellos v. ZotalisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Hamby v. WallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API