Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Schaumberg

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided July 30, 1992No. 91-1838PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHLEGEL, Judge.

The plaintiffs appeal the district court’s decision denying plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their petition and granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs contend the district court erred in: (1) denying plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their petition; (2) granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment; and (3) concluding the plaintiffs’ intentional tort claim was barred by the exclusive remedy doctrine of Iowa Code chapter 85 (Workers’ Compensation).

In the summer of 1983 the plaintiffs’ decedent, Dennis Hanson (Dennis), was employed by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Elias Siegelman, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Eva Siegelman, Deceased v. Cunard White Star LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. MilneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Clausen & Sons, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. Adam v. Mt. Pleasant Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Thorp Credit, Inc. v. GottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. CMS Continental Natural Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Nelson v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API