Michel v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
This appeal stems from the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We reverse on two of appellant’s six points and remand for further proceedings.
Appellant pleaded guilty to trafficking in cocaine and one count of conspiracy to traffic in cocaine. He entered into a nego*510tiated plea to concurrent eight-year prison terms.
Through the first and sixth points of his motion, appellant argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel due to counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress statements he made after receiving inadequate Miranda1…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Canete v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.