Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Support Obligation of Loomis

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1998No. NonePublished

1DissentGilbertson, Justice

[¶ 47.] I respectfully dissent. To me this appeal presents three issues: (1) whether the doctrines of laches and estoppel are legally applicable in a case such as this and, if so (2) should they be applied to the facts of this case and, if not (3) did the trial court abuse its discretion in setting the arrearages at $14,000? As issues (1) and (2) have been extensively set forth by the majority and the dissent of Justice Konenkamp, my major concern is with issue (3).

[¶ 48.] SDCL 25-8-5 is the statute which authorizes a mother of a child born out of wedlock to recover “a reasonable share of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ward v. LangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Billion v. BillionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kost v. KostSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Ochs v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Evans v. EvansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API