Legal Opinion

D. H. Baldwin & Co. v. Moser

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 17, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

'Appeal from Carroll District Court. — Hon. F. M. Powers, Judge. Action at law to recover • tbe price of four pianos alleged to bave been sold tbe defendant. There was a directed verdict and judgment for tbe plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Tbe plaintiff sues to recover tbe price of four pianos alleged to bave been sold tbe defendant. Tbe defendant admits a purchase of tbe four pianos, but alleges payment tberefor, and denies all allegations of tbe petition not admitted. He further pleads that tbe plaintiff by false and fraudulent representations induced bim to enter a so-called “word-contest” devised by tbe plaintiff to stimulate tbe sale of its pianos; that plaintiff, in reliance upon said repre*412sentations, and in furtherance of said contest, did receive from defendant thirteen pianos and attempt to carry out the scheme in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Free v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Harrod v. WinemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Howerton v. AugustineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Garretson v. BitzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mohler v. Guest Piano Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Brenton Bros. & Leach v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. Winneshiek County State Bank v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Carlsten-Williams Co. v. Marshall Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Drager v. Carlson Hybrid Corn Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API