Legal Opinion

Hood v. Allen

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

This appeal presents two consolidated cases, one by Mrs. A. L. Hood to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her when she fell on a sidewalk in the City of Memphis, and one by A. L. Hood, her husband, for loss of services and medical expenses, against the City of Memphis and its Light, Gas and Water Division, charging negligence on the part of defendants’ servants in creating a dangerous condition on the sidewalk. The jury returned verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs, which were approved by the trial court. Defendants *58appealed in error to tlie Court of Appeals, and that Court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elrod v. Town of FranklinTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  2. City of Memphis v. McCradyTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  3. City of Dayton v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. City of Pikeville v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  5. O'Reilly v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harper v. American Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Pearson v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Campbell v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
  4. Martin v. City of KingsportCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API