Hinton v. Goode
Supreme Court of Georgia
Laborers. Liens. Master and Servant, Laws. Construction. Remedies. Before Judge Hammond. Henry Superior Court. April Term, 18S4. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
The affidavit of plaintiff to foreclose a laborer’s lien alleged that he was employed to “labor as clerk in defend; ant’s store,” etc. The sufficiency of this affidavit was demurred to, and a motion, made to quash the execution and dismiss the levy by defendant. This motion the court sustained, and the ruling is the error insisted on here.
1. One who is employed merely to labor as clerk in a store is not such a laborer as is contemplated by §1974 of the Code, and so as to be entitled to have alien on the prop erty of his employer. Something must be averred and shown other…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Savannah & Charleston Railroad v. CallahanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Porter v. Lively & McElroySupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
3Cited by9 opinions
- Parks v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Howell v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Taylor v. FelderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Vinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Georgia Loan, Savings & Banking Co. v. DunlopSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.