Steltenpohl v. Steltenpohl
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.
Cheryl A. Steltenpohl appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying her motion to modify physical custody of her two children, who are in the sole physical custody of their father, Raymond Steltenpohl. She also appears to appeal the circuit court’s granting compensatory visitation time to her. Because of the woeful inadequacies of Cheryl Steltenpohl’s brief, we dismiss her appeal.
Steltenpohl appears pro se. Although we are mindful of the difficulties that a party appearing pro se encounters in complying with the rules of procedure, we must require pro se appellants to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Shochet v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Wilson v. CarnahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re Marriage of SpearsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moreland v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Calzaretta v. WillardMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- FIA CARD SERVICES, NA. v. HayesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Koster v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Firm Entertainment Group, LLC v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.