Robinson v. Ruprecht
Appellate Court of Illinois
Partition. Appeal from ihe Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. George A. Carpenter, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chytraus
Appellant takes the position, in argument, that upon the entry of the decree of July 14,1899, dismissing the original bill for partition, the receiver’s office and duties terminated ipso facto. It is contended that the receiver’s function and duty terminated by that action of the chancellor so that thereafter the receiver’s possession of the properties in question was wrongful and he could, thereafter, charge nothing for his services- as receiver. In the first place, counsel in taking such broad and radical position overlooks the fact that the cause did not terminate by the order of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Standish v. MusgroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Flaherty v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Smith v. ChytrausIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Heffron v. RiceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fiorito v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- W. E. Erickson Construction, Inc. v. Congress-Kenilworth Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- City of Chicago v. Concordia Evangelical Lutheran ChurchAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- Clear Creek Power & Development Co. v. CutlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Pacific Coast Coal Co. v. EsaryWashington Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.