Legal Opinion

People v. Neal

New York County Courts

Decided March 6, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gary J. Weber, J.

The defendant, charged with forcible rape, has moved this court to compel the District Attorney to release certain blood and hair samples, or portions thereof, of the herein complainant for the purpose of testing by the defendant. These samples are already in the hands of agents of the District Attorney’s office. The defendant intends to test the blood for the presence of cocaine.

Counsel for the defendant also urges that the complainant be compelled to supply fresh blood and hair samples in the event that the samples already held by the District Attorney…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Virag v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. People v. GarciaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1985
  5. Suffolk County Medical Examiner v. GuidoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API