Conner v. State

NIMMONS, Judge.

Pursuant to a jury trial, appellant was convicted and sentenced on three counts of sale or delivery of cocaine. Appellant asserts that the trial court reversibly erred by overruling defense counsel’s objection *751to Investigator Daniels’ testimony during the state’s case in chief wherein Daniels characterized the bar where the drug transactions occurred, “The Squeeze Inn,” as a place where drug activity goes on. We affirm.

The investigator testified that “Drug activity goes on there” in response to the prosecutor’s inquiry as to why he was familiar with the Squeeze Inn. This brief…