Legal Opinion
Frashier v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 8, 1962No. 21486PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Justice.
That a constitutional question may not be raised for the first time in a motion for new trial is too well settled to be seriously questioned. Brown v. State, 114 Ga. 60 (2) (39 SE 873); Ga. & Fla. Ry. v. Newton, 140 Ga. 463 (3) (79 SE 142); Bentley v. Anderson-McGriff Hardware Co., 181 Ga. 813 (1) (184 SE 297); West v. Frick Co., 183 Ga. 182 (187 SE 868); Calhoun v. State, 211 Ga. 112 (84 SE2d 198). It is apparent from the face of the motion for new trial that the defendant made no effort whatever to raise the question during the trial of the case and he cannot be heard to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Local Union No. 25 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Bentley v. Anderson-McGriff Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cambron v. Canal InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Krist v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Bobo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Rogers v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Hammock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.