Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. United Telephone Company of Ohio
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
We have before us appellee’s motion to dismiss an appeal brought by appellant, United Telephone Company of Ohio, from an order entered by the District Court on June 29, 1973. Appellee contends that said order was not the final order of the court within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1970), and in any event it was not “a separate document” within the meaning of Rule 58(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and hence, that this court lacks jurisdiction cf. the appeal.
In the June 29 order the District Court specifically indicated, “Findings of fact and conclusions of law shall follow,”…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. IndrelunasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- The Richland Trust Company v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by8 opinions
- Daniel Diamond, by His Mother Justine Diamond v. Floretta McKenzieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Tesmer v. GranholmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Nelle Cloyd v. Elliot Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Columbus Coated Fabrics, a Division of Borden Chemical Company, and Borden, Inc. v. The Industrial Commission of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Robert M. Rubin and Patricia Cohen v. Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn, Richard A. Barnhart, Danny L. Todd, and Gregory A. ToddCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.