Legal Opinion

Iaegar v. Metcalf

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1908No. Civil No. 1008PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District, in and for the County of Pima. John H. Campbell, Judge. The facte are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

— The complaint in this action charges that the plaintiff, Metcalf, during the year 1906, worked for defendant, Iaeger, as cook in the latter’s hotel in the city of Tucson, and further, quoting the language of the complaint, “that on or about July 10, 1906, while the plaintiff was engaged in the performance of his duties as cook under said contract, and without cause or provocation, the defendant made an attack upon the plaintiff, striking the plaintiff in the eye with false knuckles, knocking him down, and otherwise beating and bruising this plaintiff, causing the loss of one of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Scott v. DonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. QuigleySupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  5. The" City of Panama"Supreme Court of the United States · 1880

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. Dwyer v. LibertIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Thompson v. ShanleyMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Wilson v. HallWyoming Supreme Court · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API