Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Electric Co. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1982No. Appeal, No. 1884 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION by

Judge Blatt,

Pennsylvania Electric Company (Penelec) appeals from an order of the Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed the Referee’s finding that Deirdre M. Potash (claimant) was “able to work and available for suitable work” and therefore eligible for benefits pursuant to Section 401(d)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Act).1

The claimant had been employed as a meter reader/collector for Penelec and her duties required her not only to climb in and out of a Plymouth Trail Duster2 but to do considerable walking in all types *216of weather…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. James v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Maxwell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Rinehart v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. St. John v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. D. Stevens v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. D.M. Minter v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. L. Whitehurst v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. M. Mirande v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API