Legal Opinion
Senhart v. Senhart
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jeffrey S. Sunshine, J.
*863By order to show cause dated March 22, 2004, plaintiff Sharon Senhart moves for an order, pursuant to CPLR 2004, 2005 and 3012 (d), to extend her time to serve a complaint, nunc pro tunc. By order to show cause dated April 15, 2004, plaintiff moves for an order (1) allowing her to withdraw the order to show cause dated March 22, 2004, and to substitute a second order to show cause; (2) pursuant to CPLR 2004, 2005 and 3012 (d), allowing her to serve the proposed amended complaint annexed thereto, nunc pro tunc; and (3) enjoining and restraining…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lieb v. LiebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Julien v. JulienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Senhart v. SenhartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Valone v. ValoneNew York Supreme Court · 2013