Legal Opinion
Meyers v. Amerada Hess Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 1, 1986No. 84 Civ. 7697 (EW)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
This action was commenced by Howard B. Meyers against his former employer Amerada Hess Corporation. The complaint alleges two causes of action: (1) Age discrimination under 29 U.S.C. section 623 et seq.; and (2) defamation for alleged defamatory statements made during an investigative conference held by the New York State Division of Human Rights (“Division”). The defendant moves for partial summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, dismissing the defamation claim which alleges that a false and defamatory statement referring…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Youmans v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Park Knoll Associates v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Andrews v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Wiener v. WeintraubNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Earl Johnson v. General ElectricCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Herzfeld & Stern, Inc. v. BeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Stockley v. AT & T Information Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Borase v. M/A-COM, INC.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995