Rosevelt v. Dale
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
Appeal from the Court of Chancery. All the material parts of the pleadings and proofs are stated in the- opinions of the Judges; and see, also, 5 John. Ch. Rep. 174, S. C., where the pleadings and the proofs, considered material by the Chancellor in the Court below, are stated together with the,decree appealed from, and the reasons of that, decree.
1Opinion of the CourtWoodworth, J.
The appellant commenced an action in the Supreme Court, against the respondents, to recover the consideration stipulated to be paid for a title to certain lands in the state of Indiana. The contract contains two distinct covenants ; the one for the 'payment of $4400, for the title—the other for the payment of an annuity of $1000, for a coal mine supposed to be on the premises.
Suit at law.
Prayer of bill
The bill prays - that the appellant1 maybe compelled to surrender the agreement to be cancelled, that it may be declared null and void, as having been obtained by deceit and fraud, and for an…
2Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Read v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
- United States v. One 1946 Plymouth Sedan AutomobileCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- James v. Bank of the State of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
- Warner v. DanielsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1845
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.