Legal Opinion
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Enc Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 11, 2006No. 04-16401, 04-16503, 04-16538PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NOONAN, Circuit Judge.
The opinion filed May 4, 2006, and amended May 9, 2006, is hereby WITHDRAWN. An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.
With the filing of the amended opinion, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Thomas has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Noonan and Judge Robart so recommend.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no active judge has requested a vote whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing is DENIED, and the petition for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Elmendorf v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Maximo HILAO, Class Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ESTATE OF Ferdinand MARCOS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Republic of Philippines v. PimentelSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Swezey v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Dist. Attorney of N.Y. Cnty. v. Republic of the Phil.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Klamath Tribe Claims Committee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Republic of Philippines v. PimentelSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.