Legal Opinion

St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute Railroad v. Hurst

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 24, 1887PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clark County; the Hon. James F. Hughes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtPleasants, P. J.

This was an action of trespass against the railroad company for diverting surface water from its right of way, out of its natural course, against and upon the plaintiff’s land, whereby a wide and deep ditch was cut therein a distance of over 200 yards. Verdict and judgment in his favor for §100 damages.

lie had conveyed to the company for right of way a strip, 100 feet in width, running nearly east and west across his forty-acre tract, and thereby released all claim for damages by reason of the location and completion of the railroad through or upon any part of it. A branch or stream of water…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute Railroad v. HurstAppellate Court of Illinois · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bevelheimer v. GierachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Moore v. Hope Natural Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API