Legal Opinion
Mayberry v. Walters
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 16, 1988No. Nos. 88-5174, 88-5175, 88-5181 and 88-5422PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge.
Three individual defendants appeal from a portion of a final order of the district court denying their motions for a new trial or to alter or amend the judgment after a jury verdict in plaintiff’s favor. In addition, the pro se plaintiff and his former counsel appeal from other portions of the same order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1982).
Plaintiff, a state convicted prisoner, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982) against three prison officials for damages resulting from an attack on him by a fellow prisoner. He alleged…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lawrence B. Thomas, and Cross-Appellant v. E. J. Korvette, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Maurer v. International Re-Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- George S. Jonas v. Edward J. Stack, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Fluhr v. RobertsDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1979
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keenan v. City Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Bollitier v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Northeast Women's Center v. McmonagleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Mayberry v. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Northeast Women's Center v. McMonagleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.