Turner v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.
Murphy, C. J., and Smith, J., dissent. Smith, J., filed a dissenting opinion at page 647 infra, in which Murphy, C. J., concurs.
We shall decide in this case whether the testimony of a third party relating an excited utterance made by an accomplice to the third party provides the necessary corroboration of the accomplice’s testimony. We distill the facts giving rise to this issue as follows.
At the murder trial of Howard Turner, in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, John Morris, an admitted accomplice, testified that while he, Turner, and Mark Willis were committing a robbery, Turner shot Morris…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- State v. FowlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Mulcahy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Veney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Booth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Ayers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- State v. DolesznySupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.