People v. Robinson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COAKLEY, J.
Appellant was convicted and sentenced to prison on two counts of an information, each charging receipt of stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496). He does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. The evidence of guilt on both counts is not merely substantial, but conclusive and overwhelming. For that reason, and because of the complexity and extent of the evidence, we will not describe or summarize it except where necessary to a discussion of the points of law considered herein.
I
Chief among appellant’s specifications of error is the admission in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- John I. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Earl J. Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. FarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981