Legal Opinion · Dissent

Citizens Committee to Save WEFM v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 15, 1973No. 73-1057Published

1DissentFahy, Senior Circuit Judge

The question now is limited to whether the assignment should have been approved without a hearing. A hearing is required to resolve factual disputes which are substantial and material. 47 U.S.C. § 309(e). There is no doubt that this provision applies when the Commission is to decide whether a format change such as here proposed would go into effect upon Commission approval of the assignment of the broadcasting license, a decision to be made under the standard of the public interest, convenience, and necessity. See, e. g., Lakewood Broadcasting Service v. F.C.C., 156 U.S.App.D.C. 9, 478 F.2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Citizens Committee v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. The Citizens Committee to Keep Progressive Rock v. Federal Communications Commission, Midwestern Broadcasting Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Lakewood Broadcasting Service, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API