Legal Opinion

City Transp. Corp. v. Seckler

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 25, 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, J.

The City Transportation Corporation, defendant below, appeals in error from a judgment for $6,500 based upon a jury verdict in favor of William D. Seckler, administrator of the estate of his daughter, aged six years, who was killed by one of defendant’s buses one-half hour after she was dismissed from school.

It is very properly conceded that the verdict is supported by material evidence of common law negligence and of a violation of the 30 mile speed limit in business and residential sections, Code Section 2682 (b), Second and Third. The single insistence made by the assignments is that there…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tennessee Central Railway Co. v. UmenstetterTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Taylor v. CobbleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  3. Tevis v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. TranbargerTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Clinchfield Railroad Company v. ForbesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
  3. Helton v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  4. Ledford v. FisherTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Dixie Feed & Seed Co. v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API