Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Dineen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board should be reinstated.

There was substantial evidence to sustain the finding of the referee, affirmed by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, that Dineen was an employee rather than an independent contractor. There was evidence that it was a matter of choice with the individual salesman (rather than the employer) whether he be treated as an "employee” or an "independent contractor”, and that the substantial differences in treatment…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re McCabe & Willig Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. In re Kings Organization AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API