Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority v. Edwards
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 21, 2007No. C-060328PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sundermann, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority (“CMHA”), appeals from the trial court’s decision in CMHA’s action for forcible entry and detainer denying it possession of an apartment unit rented by defendant-appellee, Carlton Edwards.
CMHA’s Forcible-Entry-and-Detainer Action
{¶ 2} On August 3, 2004, Edwards entered into an agreement with CMHA for the lease of a one-bedroom apartment at the President high-rise apartment complex. According to the lease agreement, Edwards was responsible for paying rent of $136 per month. The lease agreement further…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Lyng v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rousey v. JacowaySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. LoudermilkOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. MurphyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. HammockOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- First Natl. Bank of Omaha v. Spirit Med. TransportOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- First Natl. Bank of Omaha v. Spirit Med. TransportOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.