Legal Opinion

Atley v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1971No. 33920PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Commissioner.

The issue here: Was plaintiff’s favorable testimony robbed of its probative force by her contradictory statements on cross examination and in her deposition? We say no and reverse the trial court’s order directing a verdict against plaintiff.

Plaintiff sued defendant taxicab owners for damages arising from a collision when their taxicab made a U-turn into the path of plaintiff’s automobile. The trial court found plaintiff had not made a submissible case and directed a verdict against her. Plaintiff appeals.

The collision occurred on a dark, rainy night on Broadway in St.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boehm Ex Rel. v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. Schonlau v. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  3. Walsh v. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  4. Tyler v. Board of EducationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vaeth Ex Rel. Vaeth v. GeggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. Moore v. Missouri-Nebraska Express, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. BurnsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. LawrenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. City of Kansas City v. ScanlandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API