Atley v. Williams
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
The issue here: Was plaintiff’s favorable testimony robbed of its probative force by her contradictory statements on cross examination and in her deposition? We say no and reverse the trial court’s order directing a verdict against plaintiff.
Plaintiff sued defendant taxicab owners for damages arising from a collision when their taxicab made a U-turn into the path of plaintiff’s automobile. The trial court found plaintiff had not made a submissible case and directed a verdict against her. Plaintiff appeals.
The collision occurred on a dark, rainy night on Broadway in St.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boehm Ex Rel. v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Schonlau v. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Walsh v. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Tyler v. Board of EducationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vaeth Ex Rel. Vaeth v. GeggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Moore v. Missouri-Nebraska Express, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. BurnsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. LawrenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- City of Kansas City v. ScanlandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.