Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Roux Laboratories, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been caused by the application of appellants’ hair dye, order directing examination before trial further modified by granting the motion to strike out item 2 of the notice of examination before trial, and by changing the language of item 1 to read as follows: “As to whether or not a product described in the complaint as Roux Hair Dye was manufactured by appellants and distributed by them to the defendant Jeanie Terranova.” As thus modified the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs, the examination to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Drake v. HerrmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Interstate Cigar Co. v. I.B.I. Security Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Fibron Products, Inc. v. Hooker Chemical Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Gehm v. Countess Moritza Cosmetic Co.New York Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API