Legal Opinion

Troncelliti v. Minolta Corp.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 23, 1987No. Civ. B-86-3848PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER E. BLACK, Jr., District Judge.

Thirty-six states and the District of Columbia (“the States”), acting as parens patriae on behalf of their resident consumers, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 15c(a)(1), initiated antitrust actions identical to the action filed in this private class action. The par-ens patriae actions resulted in Settlement Agreements identical to the one presently before this Court for consideration of final approval. The States of New York and Maryland filed their Complaints on February 24, 1986, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania filed its Complaint on April 11, 1986. After…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. Jack Foley Realty, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Sachs v. Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Weseley v. Spear, Leeds & KelloggDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
  2. In re Dun & Bradstreet Credit Services Customer LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
  3. South Carolina National Bank v. StoneDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1990
  4. Strougo ex rel. Brazilian Equity Fund, Inc. v. BassiniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  5. STROUGO EX REL. BRAZILIAN EQUITY FUND v. BassiniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API