Legal Opinion
Harts v. Caylor-Nickel Hospital, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 10, 1990No. 05A02-8907-CV-323PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUCHANAN, Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
Plaintiff-appellant Austin H. Harts (Harts) appeals from the grant of Caylor-Nickel Hospital’s (Caylor-Nickel) motion for judgment on the evidence after the trial court concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the case.
We reverse and remand with instructions that the jury’s verdict be reinstated.
FACTS
On February 18, 1985, Harts, then aged 77, was admitted to Caylor-Nickel for upper gastrointestinal distress. Two days later while lying in his hospital bed, Harts attempted to turn himself from his back to his left side. As Harts moved, he reached for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Winona Memorial Foundation of Indianapolis v. LomaxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Rosenbalm v. WinskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Inc. v. RayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Ogle v. St. John's Hickey Memorial HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Inc. v. RiouxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by19 opinions
- Billie Thompson v. Lance CopeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Putnam County Hospital v. SellsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- H.D. v. BHC Meadows Hospital, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- G.F. v. St. Catherine Hospital, Inc., Vatsal K. Patel, D.O., and Indiana Patient's Compensation FundIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Anonymous Hospital, Inc. v. Jane Doe, Indiana Dept. of InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.