State v. Olson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from tbe District Court of Stark County, Qr&wford, J. Defendant was convicted of violating tbe provisions chapter of tbe Laws of 1913, relating to tbe sale of snuff, and appeals. Statement by Bbuce, J. Tbe defendant appeals from a judgment of the district court of Stark county, finding him guilty of violating chapter 271 of tbe Laws of 1913, which is familiarly known as tbe “anti snuff act.”
Read the full summary
Appeal from tbe District Court of Stark County, Qr&wford, J. Defendant was convicted of violating tbe provisions chapter of tbe Laws of 1913, relating to tbe sale of snuff, and appeals. Statement by Bbuce, J. Tbe defendant appeals from a judgment of the district court of Stark county, finding him guilty of violating chapter 271 of tbe Laws of 1913, which is familiarly known as tbe “anti snuff act.” Tbe statute under which tbe defendant was prosecuted and convicted reads in part as follows: “An Act to Prohibit tbe Importation, Manufacture, Distribution, Transportation, or Sale of Snuff, or Any…
1Opinion of the CourtBeuce, J.
(after stating the facts as above). The first contention of appellant is that the information “does not show the commission of any offense in this, that the statute under which the information is drawn is void because it violates the section of the North Dakota Constitution, and also the provision of the 14-th Amendment of the Federal Constitution, inhibiting unequal legislation by the state in this, that it arbitrarily excludes from the markets of this state, and prohibits the importation, manufacture, sale, and use of, tobacco in some forms, and permits it in others, there being no…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. Packer CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. NossamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Gunn v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Norton Manufacturing Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.