Legal Opinion

Matter of Pierce v. Bowen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The claimant contracted with the respondent to drive the latter’s horses in four races at a county fair at the prevailing rate of fifteen dollars a race. In the first race in which the claimant drove for the respondent he received an accidental injury. In respect to the methods to be pursued in making the race and handling the horse to be driven the claimant was subjected to the orders of the respondent. He was directed by the respondent to drive the horse with the rein not too tightly drawn. He was directed to drive on the outer circumference of the track in order to avoid frightening the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hexamer v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Matter of Beach v. . VelzyNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Matter of Fancher v. . Boston Excelsior Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re the Claim of MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Thompson v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Rhode IslandTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Moore v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  4. Drillon v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Clark v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API