Remmer v. Gould
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.
This is an action of contract in which there was an attachment of property used in the business of wholesale candy selling under the name of Gould Candy Co.
Rose Gould, wife of the defendant, filed a petition to dissolve the attachment as the property was hers and was therefore wrongfully attached.
At a hearing on March 8th, 1940, it was agreed between Counsel for the Claimant and Counsel for the Plaintiff that an attachment had been made of the personal property employed in a certain business located at #131 Millbury Street, Worcester, Massachusetts, and that the said business was carried on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chapin v. KingsburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Chapin v. KingsburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Desmond v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Parsons v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Harriman v. GrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.