Legal Opinion

Gray v. Texas Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1935No. 10008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a complaint after demurrer had been sustained thereto.

The suit was an action at law for damages for infringement by defendant-appel-lee of United States Patent No. 1,810,826 granted to plaintiff-appellant and covering a “Grease Service Rack.”

The demurrer was based upon several grounds and was sustained generally; but the only ground relied upon by appellee in this court is as follows: “The patent which is the subject matter of the action and which is made a part of the complaint, is void upon its face because * * * it describes…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Hailes v. Van WormerSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Roberts v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Mid-Continent Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  2. Dow Chemical Co. v. Williams Bros. Well Treating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. Rubinstein v. Silex Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  4. Gatch Wire Goods Co. v. W. A. Laid-Law Wire Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  5. Stewart-Warner Corp. v. Universal Lubricating Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API