Legal Opinion

Arnoldo Rafael Ruiz Ochoa v. U.S. Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 4, 2014No. 13-13752Unpublished

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Arnoldo Ruiz Ochoa petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision that he was ineligible for a waiver of inadmissibility under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 212(h), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h), and was thus ineligible for an adjustment of status under INA § 245(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i). The IJ found Ruiz Ochoa removable pursuant to INA § 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I), for being an alien who was convicted of acts which constituted the essential elements of a crimes involving moral…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MARINBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1978
  2. EDWARDSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1990
  3. M. Fatima Guijosa De Sandoval v. U.S. Atty. Gen.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Javier Mauricio Martinez Ruiz v. U.S. Atty. Gen.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Oliver Paul Cobourne v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API