State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Van Gorder
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.
H. Judson van Gorder, Jr., appeals a summary judgment declaring that his sexually abusive acts upon a young male, John Doe, were intended and therefore not covered by van Gorder’s homeowner’s insurance policy which was issued by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm).
We affirm the finding of the district court for Buffalo County that State Farm is not required to defend van Gorder in any civil case or to pay any judgment that might be entered on account of his abusive sexual acts with John Doe.
In a criminal action, appellant, who during the time period when the sexual acts with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Linebaugh v. BerdishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Rodriguez v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Independent School District No. 656Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Allstate Insurance v. Kim W.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ten Broeck Dupont, Inc. v. BrooksKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- United National Ins. Co. v. The Tunnel, Inc. v. Jeffrey BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Doe v. HartzDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
- State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. HadleyNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.