Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cogen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 20, 1928No. 257Published

1ConcurrenceManton, Circuit Judge

The order appealed from denied the application of the plaintiff in error for the return of papers, cards, memoranda, and books seized from his person. It directs their suppression as evidence which might be offered upon the trial of an indictment found against him by the grand jury. The order is not appealable, because it is interlocutory, and not final. It was not an independent proceeding. The application for their return, as unlawful, in violation of the constitutional rights of this plaintiff in error, was prosecuted as an incident to the pending criminal proceedings. If it were an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Essgee Co. of China v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Steele v. United States No. 2Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. United States v. KirschenblattCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API