Legal Opinion
Brookstone v. Bai
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided May 27, 1997No. CV-96-327-BPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Brookstone v. Bai CV-96-327-B 05/27/97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Brookstone, Inc. v. Civil No. 96-327-B Carl B. Bai f/k/a Henry S . Bai O R D E R Brookstone, Inc. filed this declaratory judgment action against Carl B. Bai after Bai and his counsel sent several letters charging patent infringement to Brookstone's New Hampshire home office. Bai, who has had no other direct contacts with New Hampshire, moves to dismiss for lack of personal juris diction. For the reasons that follow, I grant Bai's motion. BACKGROUND In April, 1977, Bai obtained a patent (the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.