Legal Opinion

Carthan v. Lang

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 23, 1886PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from AllamaJcee Circuit Court. Action in chancery to restrain defendants, who are directors of a school district, from paying for a school-house erected under a contract made by them, and to annul the contract, and for other relief to which plaintiff may be entitled in equity. There was a decree granting relief to plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

l. school citshouse fiii-o1’ traúLpaytion. I. The petition alleges tbe following among other matters. Tbe electors of the independent school-distUct of Hardin voted a tax of $1,000 to build a school-house. The plaintiff is a resident and taxpayer of the district. The directors contracted for the building of tbe scbool-house with one *385Adams, tbe materials to be of tbe best quality, and tbe work to be done “ in a substantial and workman-like manner,” and agreed to pay him for the work and materials $800. It is alleged that the directors and Adams confederated together to defraud the district by…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Merrimon v. Paving Company.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Sioux City v. Western Asphalt Paving Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  3. McCain v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Creston Waterworks Co. v. City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Abbott v. Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API