State v. Klembus (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} In this discretionary appeal, we are asked to examine two statutory provisions that relate to the offense of operating a vehicle while under the influence (“OVI”) when the offender has had five or more OVI convictions in the past 20 years: a portion of R.C. 4511.19(G)(1)(d), which raises the OVI offense to a fourth-degree felony, and R.C. 2941.1413 (the “repeat-OVI specification”), which requires a mandatory additional prison term of one, two, three, four, or five years. We are asked to decide whether raising the felony level for an OVI offense and imposing a sentencing enhancement on a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Moore v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Elec. Classroom of Tomorrow v. Ohio Dep't of Educ., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth District, Franklin County2017
- State v. BangeraOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. BlouirOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. CelliOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. NelsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.