Rosario v. State

OPINION OF THE COURT

Philip J. Patti, J.

Claimant served his third supplemental discovery demand (exhibit A to the moving papers) on May 4, 2004, to which the defendant responded on May 28, 2004 (exhibit B to the moving papers). There are several demands for which disputes remain, despite the best attempts by the parties to resolve the same.

Accordingly, claimant has made a motion (No. M-69369), inter alia, to compel production of the disputed, and purportedly discoverable, material, and the defendant has made a cross motion (No. CM-69448) for a protective order. As part of his motion, claimant…