Legal Opinion

In Re the Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Served on the Museum of Modern Art

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

93 N.Y.2d 729 (1999)

719 N.E.2d 897

697 N.Y.S.2d 538

In the Matter of the GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM SERVED ON THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART, Appellant.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued August 24, 1999.

Decided September 21, 1999.

Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, New York City (Evan A. Davis, Edwin B. Mishkin, Richard F. Ziegler and Caren Myers of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney of New York County, New York City (Mark Dwyer of counsel), for respondent.

Magavern, Magavern & Grimm, L. L. P., Buffalo…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API