Legal Opinion

Abernathy v. Goebel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 2, 1967No. Nos. 41158, 41159PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Vice Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs in error, the defendants below filed separate appeals and the same were docketed No. 41,158 and No. 41,159 in this Court. The two appeals were consolidated for disposition under No. 41,158. Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff brought an action to recover damages to his cotton crop allegedly caused by the spraying of chemicals from airplanes operated by the defendant Aerial Applications, Inc., while said defendant was spraying lands adjacent to the lands of the plaintiff owned by the defendant C. H. Abernathy.

The case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aldridge v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Cosmo Construction Company v. LodenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Hanna v. ParrishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Harley v. DamronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Meadow Gold CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. Watson v. ShanbourSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API