Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Gotlieb

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 28, 1963No. 40177PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

“Where the wife signs the note as an apparent principal, the burden is on her to prove that she signed as surety only, and that the payee of the note, with knowledge of the facts which would constitute her a surety, contracted with her as a surety.” Lovelady v. Moss, 50 Ga. App. 652, 653 (179 SE 168); Dye v. Richards, 210 Ga. 601, 602 (81 SE2d 820), and cases cited. We think that the assumption that the defendant signed as a maker, arising from her signature on the face of the note under that of her husband without any designation of the capacity in which she signed, could…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McRitchie v. Atlanta Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Dobbins v. Blanchard, Humber & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Dye v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  4. Lovelady v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Daniel v. G. Ober & Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seaboard Finance Co. v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API