Legal Opinion

Dumain v. Carey

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Melvyn Tanenbaum, J.

This motion by defendants and cross motion by plaintiffs each seeking summary judgment (motion No. 14,599) and the motion by plaintiffs for leave to serve a supplemental complaint and cross motion by defendants for leave to serve an amended answer (motion No. 9,770) are consolidated in the interest of judicial economy and are determined as follows:

In this action pursuant to State Finance Law article 7-A, plaintiffs in their capacity as citizens and taxpayers of the State of New York and as members of the Board of Education of Huntington Union Free…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Levine v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Board of Education v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Levine v. New York State Department of Social ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dumain v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API