Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Hardy
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to Essex Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Magie, J.
The bills of exceptions show the following undisputed facts:
The Passaic Rolling Mill Company contracted with the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, the plaintiff in error, to furnish at a specified price the materials for rebuilding certain railroad bridges of the latter company and also skilled workmen to erect such bridges. The workmen furnished were such as had previously been in the employ of the rolling mill company. They continued to be paid by that company, but after payment the amount paid, with some percentage added,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hardy v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
3Cited by15 opinions
- Driscoll v. TowleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Ellinghouse v. Ajax Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
- Fielders v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Berry v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Benson v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.