Legal Opinion

Errico v. Washburn Williams Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 1909No. 141Published

At Law. On motion by defendant for judgment non obstante veredicto.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.

The jury gave a verdict for $500, a mere pittance, to the plaintiff for the loss of his fingers, if the defendants were really liable. It was evidently a compromise between judgment and sympathy. They recognized that the plaintiff had only himself to blame for the accident, but they did not like to have him go without something. The court, however, cannot deal with the case so complacently, but must dispose of it without regard to the consequences.

The plaintiff’s fingers were cut off by the revolving knives of a machine, called a “joiner,” at which he was working.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Butler v. FrazeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Blumenthal v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1897
  3. Haines v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API