Legal Opinion
In the Interest of A.M.G. v. Missouri Division of Family Services
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 1983No. 46285, 46508, 46505, 46509 and 46510PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES K. PREWITT, Special Judge.
The five cases consolidated here are termination of parental rights proceedings. See §§ 211.442-211.492, RSMo 1978. In each case parental rights were terminated and custody granted to the division of family services. The question presented is whether the trial courts pursuant to § 211.-462.4, RSMo 1978, properly assessed as “costs”, to be paid by the division of family services, attorneys’ fees for the attorneys appointed to represent the child and in three of the cases a parent. Appellant division of family services contends it was improper “because there is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Willow Springs v. Missouri State LibrarianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Goldberg v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- In Re the Interest of K.P.B.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- In the Interest of L. R. R. v. Christian Family Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- State ex rel. Missouri Division of Family Services v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In the Interest of D.L.D.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- WESTON POINT RESORT CONDO. OWNERS'ASS'N, INC. v. FloroMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Laws v. Secretary of StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hillyard v. Hutter Oil Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- In the Interest of D.L.S.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.